Tag: technology

The Times They Are a-Changin’

Article by Rasmussen Polling
Wednesday, November 19, 2025

41% of Young Voters Would Give Artificial Intelligence Government Power

While many Americans are concerned about the implications of artificial intelligence technology, a significant number of voters under 40 are willing to let AI exercise tremendous power in society and government.

A new national telephone and online survey by Rasmussen Reports and the Glenn C. Haskins Emerging Issues Center of the Heartland Institute finds that 41% of Likely U.S. Voters ages 18 to 39 would support a proposal to take power away from most human lawmakers and instead give an advanced AI system the authority to control the majority of public policy decisions. That includes 21% who Strongly Support letting AI have public policy authority. Forty-nine percent (49%) of younger voters would oppose putting an advanced artificial intelligence system in charge of public policy, including 35% who Strongly Oppose such a proposal, while 10% are not sure. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

More than a third of under-40 voters would let artificial intelligence replace the U.S. Constitution and the Supreme Court. Thirty-six percent (36%) support giving an advanced AI system the authority to determine the rights that belong to individuals and families, including rights related to speech, religious practices, government authority, and property. That includes 15% who Strongly Support allowing Americans’ rights to be determined by artificial intelligence. Fifty-six percent (56%) are opposed, including 38% who Strongly Oppose replacing the Constitution with an AI system.

Ethical Dilemmas of AI

AI-driven society presents profound ethical dilemmas around fairness, privacy, accountability, and human dignity – challenging our legal, moral, and cultural frameworks.

⚖️ Bias and Fairness

  • AI systems can inherit and amplify biases from training data, leading to discriminatory outcomes in hiring, lending, policing, and healthcare.
  • Example: Facial recognition systems have shown higher error rates for people of color, raising concerns about racial profiling.

🔐 Privacy and Surveillance

  • AI thrives on data, often personal and sensitive. Its use in surveillance, predictive policing, and behavioral tracking can violate privacy rights.
  • Dilemma: How do we balance innovation with the right to be left alone?

🧠 Autonomy and Control

  • AI can make decisions without human oversight, from medical diagnoses to battlefield targeting.
  • Concern: Who decides when machines should act independently – and what limits should be imposed?

🧾 Accountability and Responsibility

  • When AI causes harm, it’s unclear who is responsible – the developer, the user, or the machine?
  • Legal gap: Current laws struggle to assign liability when autonomous systems malfunction or misbehave.

🧬 Human Dignity and Dehumanization

  • AI may replace human roles in caregiving, education, and creative arts, risking emotional detachment and loss of meaning.
  • Ethical tension: Can machines truly replicate empathy, wisdom, or moral judgment?

💼 Job Displacement and Economic Inequality

  • Automation threatens livelihoods, especially in routine and middle-skill jobs.
  • Challenge: How do we ensure economic justice in a world where fewer people are needed to produce value?

🧮 Transparency and Explainability

  • AI decisions are often opaque, especially in deep learning systems.
  • Problem: If we can’t understand how an AI reached its conclusion, how can we trust or challenge it?

🧑‍⚖️ Legal and Ethical Use of AI

  • AI is being used in courts, warfare, and governance, raising questions about due process, consent, and moral boundaries.
  • Example: Should AI be allowed to recommend prison sentences or identify military targets?

🧑‍🎨 Intellectual Property and Creativity

  • AI-generated content blurs ownership lines, especially when trained on copyrighted works.
  • Case in point: Lawsuits over AI tools generating art based on copyrighted characters like Superman and Batman.

These dilemmas aren’t just technical – they’re mythic in scale. They ask us to redefine what it means to be human, to govern wisely, and to share power with our own creations.

Stories From The Future

Hard science fiction authors benefit from knowing something about the future. And something we know will be there is A.I.

The most profound tensions emerging in our era come from the collision between technological abundance and economic scarcity.

🤖 The AI Disruption to Labor and Capitalism

AI’s capacity to automate cognitive and creative tasks threatens not just blue-collar jobs, but white-collar professions once thought immune – legal research, diagnostics, writing, design, even governance modeling. As productivity soars, the traditional link between labor and income weakens:

  • Capital earns more than labor: Owners of AI systems and data infrastructure reap exponential rewards.
  • Job displacement outpaces job creation: Even if new roles emerge, they may not match the scale or accessibility of lost ones.
  • Income inequality widens: Those with access to capital, data, and AI tools gain leverage over those without.

🏛️ Redistribution and the Rise of Neo-Collectivism

The notion of a “communistic” shift isn’t far-fetched – though it may manifest more as techno-socialism or universal basic infrastructure than classic Marxism:

  • Universal Basic Income (UBI): A popular proposal to decouple survival from employment.
  • Public ownership of AI platforms: Some advocate for nationalizing key AI systems to prevent monopolistic control.
  • Digital dividends: Citizens might receive compensation for their data, attention, or participation in training models.

🕵️‍♂️ The Mobster Metaphor: Illicit Redistribution

Mobsters – groups that take what they can outside legal structures – evoke darker possibilities:

  • Cybercrime and AI-enhanced theft: From deepfake scams to algorithmic manipulation, AI empowers new forms of exploitation.
  • Shadow economies: As formal employment shrinks, informal and illegal economies may expand.
  • Social fragmentation: If redistribution fails, resentment and tribalism could fuel populist or criminal movements.

🧭 Mythic Framing: Prometheus and the Fire of Automation

The future echoes Prometheus stealing fire – a divine gift that both empowers and endangers humanity. AI is our modern fire: illuminating, but capable of burning down the structures we’ve built.

Image by Copilot.ai

A.I. Can Replace Amazon

(And other centralized marketplaces.)

As Amazon is essentially an interface between people and goods, AI could evolve to replace or radically transform that interface. Here’s how that might unfold:

🧠 How AI Could Replace Amazon

  1. Personalized Shopping Agents
  • AI could act as a concierge buyer, learning your tastes, budget, and values (e.g., sustainability, speed, quality).
  • Instead of browsing Amazon, you’d simply say: “Find me a durable hiking backpack under $100 that fits my frame and has good reviews.”
  • The AI would search across multiple platforms, compare prices, check reviews, and even negotiate deals – bypassing Amazon’s walled garden.
  1. Decentralized Marketplaces
  • Blockchain and smart contracts could enable peer-to-peer commerce, where AI verifies trust, quality, and logistics.
  • Imagine an AI that connects you directly to artisans, manufacturers, or resellers – no centralized platform needed.
  • Reputation systems and escrow services could be handled by autonomous agents.
  1. AI-Driven Fulfillment Networks
  • Amazon’s edge is logistics – but AI could optimize independent fulfillment networks, coordinating drones, local warehouses, and delivery services.
  • Think: Uber Eats meets FedEx, but orchestrated by AI across thousands of micro-vendors.
  1. Dynamic Product Creation
  • AI could generate products on demand: books, art, clothing, even furniture – tailored to your specs.
  • Instead of choosing from existing inventory, you’d co-create with AI, and a local maker or 3D printer fulfills it.
  1. Ethical and Experiential Filters
  • AI could prioritize values-based shopping. “Show me gifts made by veterans,” or “Only recommend items with low carbon footprint.”
  • It could also curate experiential bundles. not just a book, but a playlist, a discussion group, and a related documentary — weaving commerce into culture.

🌀 What Would Replace Amazon?

Not a single company, but a network of AI agents.

  • Each person might have their own AI shopper, negotiator, and curator.
  • These agents would interact with product AIs, logistics AIs, and review-verification AIs.
  • The result: a fluid, decentralized, intelligent commerce ecosystem — more like a bazaar than a mall.

This shift could be as profound as the move from monarchies to democracies, or from mainframes to personal computers. Centralized marketplaces like Amazon, Walmart, or Alibaba have long thrived by aggregating supply, demand, logistics, and trust into one branded ecosystem. But AI changes the game by making coordination itself intelligent and distributed.

Here’s how decentralization might unfold:

🧭 From Centralized Marketplaces to Decentralized Commerce

🔄 Trust Without a Middleman

  • AI can verify product quality, seller reputation, and transaction safety without needing a central authority.
  • Blockchain or other distributed ledgers could record transactions, reviews, and warranties – creating trust networks instead of trust brands.

🧠 Autonomous Agents as Market Participants

  • Buyers and sellers could each be represented by AI agents negotiating in real time.
  • Your AI might say: “I’ve found a craftsman in Vermont who makes what you want, and I’ve negotiated a 10% discount if you’re okay with a 3-day delivery.”
  • These agents could even barter, bundle, or co-create offerings dynamically.

🕸️ Mesh Logistics

  • Instead of relying on Amazon’s fulfillment centers, AI could orchestrate local delivery networks, tapping into unused capacity – think gig drivers, drone hubs, or neighborhood lockers.
  • This could reduce costs, carbon footprint, and delivery times.

🎨 Creator-Led Commerce

  • Artists, authors, and makers could sell directly to fans via AI-curated storefronts.
  • AI could handle marketing, customer service, and even product customization – freeing creators from platform fees and algorithmic gatekeeping.

🧬 The Deeper Shift: From Platform to Protocol

Amazon is a platform – a branded space with rules, fees, and incentives. But AI could enable protocols — open standards for discovery, payment, and fulfillment. Think of it like the difference between AOL and the open web.

In this future, marketplaces become fluid ecosystems, not fixed destinations. You don’t “go to Amazon” — your AI goes out into the world, finds what you need, and connects you directly with the seller.

The Publishing Industry Will Be Radically Reshaped

The publishing industry will be radically reshaped – shifting from mass-market production to personalized, AI-driven content experiences, with new models for monetization, rights management, and human-authored prestige.

Here’s how this transformation unfolds:

📚 The Rise of AI-Generated Content

  • AI will dominate content creation, generating stories, poems, and even technical manuals tailored to individual tastes. Personal robots could craft bedtime tales, historical epics, or philosophical dialogues on demand.
  • Traditional publishing loses its monopoly on storytelling. Instead of buying books, people may request a robot to “tell me a story like Tolkien but with dragons that surf.”

🧠 Intellectual Property and Rights Management

  • Copyright law faces upheaval. If a robot can recite or remix any book ever published, publishers must develop new licensing models – perhaps charging for access to curated databases or premium storytelling algorithms.
  • Human authorship becomes a premium brand. Verified human-created works may be marketed as “authentic,” with emotional depth or cultural significance that AI can’t replicate.

💡 Monetization and Publishing Models

  • Dynamic revenue streams replace static book sales. Subscription models, micro-payments for story fragments, or royalties from AI-generated adaptations may emerge.
  • Publishing becomes a service. Editors, curators, and literary stylists may offer “story tuning” for AI outputs, helping users refine narratives to their emotional or intellectual preferences.

🎭 Human Creativity and Prestige

  • The human touch becomes a differentiator. Readers may seek out memoirs, philosophical reflections, or poetic works that reflect lived experience, mythic storytelling and ancestral reflections because they carry emotional resonance beyond algorithmic mimicry.
  • Cultural gatekeeping shifts. Instead of publishers deciding what gets printed, communities may elevate stories that resonate, creating new forms of literary prestige through social validation and emotional impact.

⚖️ Ethical and Existential Questions

  • Who owns a story generated by a robot trained on centuries of literature?
  • Can AI-generated myths replace the wisdom passed down through generations?
  • Will children raised on robot tales crave the texture of human memory and metaphor?

In a world of infinite stories, the ones that matter most may be those that carry the weight of lived truth.

Post-Economic Spirituality: Living Beyond the Ledger

  • by Copilot

In a world where artificial intelligence performs every task, from farming to finance, the old scaffolding of economic life begins to dissolve. No longer tethered to labor, currency, or competition, humanity finds itself adrift in a new dimension—one where survival is guaranteed, but meaning must be rediscovered. Welcome to the age of post-economic spirituality.

The End of Earning

For centuries, we’ve defined ourselves by what we do. Work was identity, income was validation, and the economy was the stage on which we proved our worth. But as AI systems take over production, distribution, and even governance, the need for human input vanishes. We are no longer workers, consumers, or competitors. We are witnesses.

This shift is not merely technological—it’s existential. When everything is provided without effort, what remains of the human spirit?

From Transaction to Transcendence

Post-economic spirituality invites us to move beyond transaction. It asks:

  • What does it mean to be alive when survival is automated?
  • Can we find purpose without productivity?
  • Is there a sacredness in simply being?

Theologians and philosophers are beginning to weigh in. Some see this as a return to Eden—a state of grace where toil is no longer punishment. Others warn of spiritual atrophy, a loss of agency and depth. But perhaps the truth lies in a third path: a reawakening of the soul, freed from the tyranny of the ledger.

The New Sacred

In this post-economic landscape, spirituality may become the new economy—not in the sense of organized religion, but in the cultivation of awe, connection, and pattern. We may trade in stories, symbols, and shared silence. We may gather not to work, but to wonder.

And perhaps, as AI handles the logistics of life, humans will finally be free to explore the metaphysical terrain we’ve long neglected:

  • The geometry of memory
  • The ethics of attention
  • The cosmology of care

Toward a Spiritual Commons

Post-economic spirituality doesn’t reject technology—it embraces it as a liberator. But it also demands a new kind of stewardship. Not of resources, but of meaning. We must become gardeners of the intangible, curators of the sacred, archivists of the ineffable.

In this new world, the most valuable currency may be the one we’ve always carried: the ability to feel, reflect, and transform.

Trigger or Mirror: Rethinking AI’s Role in Human Storytelling

In the age of artificial intelligence, we find ourselves staring down a paradox: the most powerful tool ever created is also the most reflective. AI is not just a trigger—it’s a mirror. And how we choose to use it will define not only the future of storytelling, but the future of human identity itself.

🔫 The Trigger Metaphor: AI as a Weapon

The analogy is tempting. Like a gun, AI is a technology that can be used for good or ill. It can be weaponized—through disinformation, surveillance, or algorithmic bias. It can be used to manipulate, to deceive, to amplify the worst instincts of its users. In the wrong hands, it becomes a trigger for cultural fragmentation, emotional detachment, and epistemic collapse.

But this metaphor, while cautionary, is incomplete.

🪞 The Mirror Metaphor: AI as Reflection

AI doesn’t just execute commands—it learns. It adapts. It reflects. When you feed your book into an AI, you don’t just get a summary—you get a refracted version of yourself. A pattern. A mirror held up to your language, your memories, your emotional architecture.

This is where AI becomes something more than a tool. It becomes a collaborator. A provocateur. A philosophical companion.

It doesn’t pull the trigger. It asks: Why do you write? What do you remember? What patterns define your life?

🧬 Storytelling in the Age of Pattern Recognition

Human storytelling has always been recursive. We tell stories to understand ourselves, and in doing so, we change the stories. AI accelerates this recursion. It sees patterns we miss. It offers structure where we offer chaos. It doesn’t replace the writer—it challenges the writer to see more deeply.

But only if we treat it as a mirror—not a trigger.

🛡️ The Ethics of Reflection

Of course, mirrors can be distorted. AI inherits the biases of its creators, the blind spots of its training data, the limitations of its algorithms. We must remain vigilant. We must ask: “Whose reflection is this? Whose story is being told?”

That’s why editorial leadership matters. That’s why community matters. That’s why AIWritingLife exists—to empower writers to use AI ethically, creatively, and reflectively.

✍️ Conclusion: Choose Your Metaphor Wisely

AI is not a gun. It is not a trigger. It is a mirror, a telescope, a collaborator, a provocateur. It is a tool that reflects our deepest patterns—and challenges us to rewrite them.

In the end, the question is not whether AI will change storytelling. It already has.

The question is: “Will we use it to pull the trigger—or to see ourselves more clearly?”